Submission & Peer Review | The Wiley Network

Now that you've done the research and written the article it's time for submission and peer review. Discover useful resources for researcher's navigating the peer reviewed article submission process including tools to aid in article submission, peer review one-pagers, and more.  


Submission & Peer Review | Research Publishing

5 Options to Consider After Article Rejection

What can you do if your manuscript is rejected? This blog post looks at five options that you might want to consider.

8 reasons why journals reject manuscripts

This infographic from Editage Insights lists some of the most common reasons for rejection, and offers some quick tips on how you can avoid making these mistakes.

8 Tools to Help You Navigate the Pre-Publication Journey

Navigate the pre-publication journey with this infographic, offering eight tips and tools to help you prepare for submission.

Get Published: Submission Process

In this video, former Wiley editor Martin Wells offers information and advice for authors on manuscript submission.

"Desk-rejected" from Your Chosen Journal? What Next?

“Desk-rejected” from your chosen journal? What next?

Editor’s Black Box Webinar – What happens after you submit your paper?

Editors: The Unsung Heroes of Peer Review?

In this blog post, representatives from Wiley and Publons discuss the role of editors, and how this role can be better acknowledged.

How Do You Get Your Paper in Front of the Right Reviewer?

Jonathan Foster from the University of Cambridge offers tips to help you get your paper the review it deserves.

How Submission Can Be a Positive Experience - Discover the Benefits of a Journal Transfer Network

Journal transfer networks can help you to overcome the frustration of reformatting and resubmitting your paper once more. This infographic explains the details and highlight the benefits for you.

How to Deal with Conflicting Reviewer Comments

What should you do as an author if you receive wildly divergent peer reviews? Managing Editor Anne Borcherds offers her advice.

How to distinguish yourself with ORCID

Why register for an ORCID ID? This short article explains some of the benefits.

How to Grab a Journal Editor's Attention With Your Industry-Sponsored Research Submission

Expert advice on how to grab a journal editor's attention with industry-sponsored research.

Infographic: What Is ORCID?

Discover what happens to ORCID iDs during manuscript submission in this infographic, which also gives a useful overview of how ORCID benefits society members and the research community at large.

ORCID's New Auto-Update Functionality: What Does it Mean for You?

It's easy to connect your ORCID iD with your research. In this blog post, ORCID's auto-update functionality is fully explained.

Plagiarism : What's the Truth?

Plagiarism: What's the Truth?

Progressing Towards Transparency – More Journals Join Our Transparent Peer Review Pilot

Greater openness and reproducibility of research, including increasing transparency in peer review.

Reasons for Manuscript Rejection - Editage Insights

Resubmit Your Paper With Confidence

Join our webinar with Dr. Julia Kostova to find out why your article has been rejected and what you can do about it.

Supporting Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics-What We're Doing Lately and Why

Upholding the values of research integrity has never been more important to responsibly conducting research.

Tracking your Article from Acceptance to Publication

Before your accepted article is published online, it goes through our production process. Here are a short video and guide to tracking your article from acceptance to publication.

Upholding Research Integrity and Publishing Ethics

Chris Graf, Director of Research Integrity & Publishing Ethics at Wiley, discusses some of the major concerns around integrity in publishing.

What Happens at a Peer Review Workshop?

One researcher shares what she learned at a recent peer review workshop run by Sense about Science.

What Is Quality in Peer Review?

What does quality in peer review actually mean and how can we identify it?