Discover how Wiley supports peer reviewers including the ethical, academic, society, and real world implications of this incredibly important role in the scientific processs
Peer Reviewers | Research Publishing
10 Steps for Reviewing Resubmissions
This helpful infographic from the Wiley Peer Review Management team sets out ten steps to guide you through the process of reviewing resubmissions.
4 Tools to Help You Gain Recognition For Your Research and Reviews
This infographic highlights one of the key themes in open science - open recognition and reward - by looking at four key initiatives: ORCID, Kudos, Altmetric and Publons.
This infographic neatly summarizes the peer review process, the types of decision and reasons for rejection, as well as six top tips for surviving peer review!
A Practical Guide to Peer Review for Early Career Researchers
Watch this on-demand webinar where our experienced team outline the processes involved in peer review, show you how to contruct a review report, and how to give constructive feedback.
Across the Desk: An Editor's guide to peer review best practice
In this blog post, Brian Johnson, Managing Editor of The Chemical Record, addresses some of the issues faced by peer reviewers, from the perspective of an editor.
Considerations for the Delegator and Recipient of a Delegated Peer Review: Part 1
In the first of two blog posts, Julian L. Wong, Managing Editor of Molecular Reproduction & Development, looks at what factors a delegator of a peer review should consider.
Considerations for the Delegator and Recipient of a Delegated Peer Review: Part 2
In the second of two blog posts, Julian L. Wong, Managing Editor of Molecular Reproduction & Development, looks at what the recipient of a delegated peer review needs to take into consideration.
Essential Areas for Improving Peer Review – Three Experts Share Their Views
Is there an accepted ‘standard’ for peer review? Or, could we think of peer review as an ‘aspirational framework’ consisting of some practices that meet expectations and others that could be improved?
Roger Watson, Editor of Nursing Open and the Journal of Advanced Nursing, explores the different types of peer review and their advantages and disadvantages.
Finding new, robust and practical ways to add transparency to peer review: The Clinical Genetics story
Reiner Veitia, editor-in-chief of the journal Clinical Genetics, Publons, and ScholarOne – introduces a new, more robust and automated option for researchers to choose transparent peer review
Emma Sayer, lecturer at Lancaster University, presents study findings that show,despite efforts to improve gender equality in academia, gender bias still affects many areas of science.