This helpful infographic from the Wiley Peer Review Management team sets out ten steps to guide you through the process of reviewing resubmissions.

Ten essential tips for peer reviewing.

This infographic highlights one of the key themes in open science - open recognition and reward - by looking at four key initiatives: ORCID, Kudos, Altmetric and Publons.

This infographic neatly summarizes the peer review process, the types of decision and reasons for rejection, as well as six top tips for surviving peer review!

Director of Research Integrity and Ethics Chris Graf speaks to David Mellor from the Center for Open Science about the benefits of Registered Reports.

Watch this on-demand webinar where our experienced team outline the processes involved in peer review, show you how to contruct a review report, and how to give constructive feedback.

In this blog post, Brian Johnson, Managing Editor of The Chemical Record, addresses some of the issues faced by peer reviewers, from the perspective of an editor.

Managing Editor Thomas Gaston discusses the current imbalance in regional diversity of peer reviewers in this blog post from Peer Review Week.

Richard Threlfall, Editor of the Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry, discusses why networking is so important for early career researchers.

Wiley is excited to share that over 1,000,000 review records from Wiley journals have been added on Publons.

In the first of two blog posts, Julian L. Wong, Managing Editor of Molecular Reproduction & Development, looks at what factors a delegator of a peer review should consider.

In the second of two blog posts, Julian L. Wong, Managing Editor of Molecular Reproduction & Development, looks at what the recipient of a delegated peer review needs to take into consideration.

Is there an accepted ‘standard’ for peer review? Or, could we think of peer review as an ‘aspirational framework’ consisting of some practices that meet expectations and others that could be improved?

This post describes the second “essential area” for better peer review, namely “Ethics,” from our article “What does Better Peer Review Look Like?”

In this blog post, read about the “JRST Doctoral Mentored Reviewer Initiative" for early career reviewers.

Roger Watson, Editor of Nursing Open and the Journal of Advanced Nursing, explores the different types of peer review and their advantages and disadvantages.

How do we achieve "fairer" peer review?

Reiner Veitia, editor-in-chief of the journal Clinical Genetics, Publons, and ScholarOne – introduces a new, more robust and automated option for researchers to choose transparent peer review

Managing Editor Tom Gaston lists five tips to help editors find a suitable pool of reviewers.

In celebration of Peer Review Week 2018, we take a closer look at diversity in peer review.

Emma Sayer, lecturer at Lancaster University, presents study findings that show,despite efforts to improve gender equality in academia, gender bias still affects many areas of science.